Project x iron 5.5 vs 6.0 driver#

The end of the grip is relatively soft and becomes stiffer as the grip progresses, in the middle very soft and in the tipp stiffer again. The bend profile of the Project X is quite interesting and roughly comparable to the Nippon Modus 3 120. This stepless construction makes the tip very stiff and therefore provides more precision with optimal control of trajectory and spin. And this without having a negative influence on control. However, this is not only an advantage in terms of design but also in terms of flex distribution and energy transfer. This shaft is constructed without steps and therefore has a unique design. But also off the Tour, Project X wants to continue with new shaft concepts such as the Project X IO or the Catalyst, a graphite shaft with the characteristics of steel shafts. Over the years, more shafts have been added to the original Project X, most notably the Project X LZ, which is also very popular on Tour. Meanwhile Project X is part of 'True Temper', but has not lost any of its original concept. Players like Rory McIlroy do not think about changing the shaft. Project X played a major role on the Tour from the very beginning with its basic low launch, low spin profile. However, this shaft became famous for its unique 'rifle design' without the usual steps.

Project x iron 5.5 vs 6.0 driver#

Thanks a lot.Project X is now also involved in the market for wood and driver shafts. Does that info all appear to coincide with the Task A in 5.0 or the KBS Visit in 5.5 flex?Any additional input, information, or suggestions would be appreciated. Nevertheless, I lately strike some irons with DG Ur300 shafts at a demo time, and actually like that. In the last when I have got tried some other shafts, l didn't Iike the DG S300 - felt like I never ever loaded it correctly. Decent speed, more of a swingér than a batter. My driver SS is definitely generally around the low 100s. That is what they specify as 'tough,' but I believe that the common consensus will be that it usually plays a little softer than additional tough shafts. He recommended the KBS Trip in a 5.5 bend as similar to the Project X.A few points of referrals: I possess performed Hogan irons for a long period and possess always played the Apex 4 base. The 2nd state, and this could become related to the initial, is that the Task Times amp the KBS Visit play to slightly various flexes. It has been something associated to the amount of metal used in the suggestion for balance vs.

He stated it has been associated to how they are usually constructed - something I haven't happen to be able to discover any details on, but probably because I can't remember the specific terminology he utilized (hey, my 4-yr-old girl has been with me, therefore I didn't capture.everything. One can be that the KBS Visit shaft has even more 'motion' (his term) in the suggestion - which I guess might mean that the Project X is more tip-stiff. The man there had been displaying me the KBS Tour shaft (but only in a collection - they didn't have got either on hand).Right here are usually 2 items he told me that l hadn't heard before, so I'm expecting someone right here can verify or clarify, because when I searched online last night, I couldn't find anything related to this. I've hit the Project Times and like thé 5.0. And furthermore that the authentic inventor, Kim Braly, made the KBS Tour base to improve on the Task X.I was in the store last last night talking with the guy at the restoration desk. My really basic understanding will be that the present Project X shaft is certainly not precisely the same as the authentic Project X base. Second best was Erixon 565, which had been almost on my MP53 level.

Topped Hot Steel, 900 forged and AP2 by significantly. Would you simply rely on and proceed with what you possess been installed - or test the lighter bend 5.0 version?Īny encounters with this LZ base in respect of flex?īy the method - the MMC werde by significantly the greatest mind for me. On top I realized that there will be a 5 - bend with 110 gary the gadget guy, which wasn't available during the fitted. I realized that 5.5 is definitely a Regular+ or firm flex and with my club head quickness of 76 mph with 6 iron, this could become a little bit too very much relating to concept. Afterwards at home I examine, that numerous people purchase the project Times shafts with a wrong, too difficult bend. So I will become going from Nippon 950 to PX LZ 5.5. The beliefs club head speed, basketball swiftness + dispersion have long been very best by far with this base and mind compared to Nippon Modus 105 R, KBS Trip 90 L and my own Nippon 950 Ur with MP 53 (which had been fitted finish 2010). Proceeded to go through an demanding fitting yesterday and finally ended up with MP18 MMC and Project A LZ 5.5, which